Why Does DED Enable "Near-Net Shaping"? Exploring the Mysteries of Rapid Solidification Under High-Energy Beams
Directed Energy Deposition (DED) changes the way things are made by letting them be shaped almost perfectly using high-energy lasers or electron beams to control the quick solidification process. This method melts special Specialized wire materials for additive remanufacturing wire materials for additive remanufacturing one layer at a time, making parts that are remarkably close to their end sizes. Extreme temperature differences—often more than 10,000°C per second—that smooth out the grain structure and reduce warping are the key. When combined with carefully engineered wire feedstock made for the best thermal response, DED can achieve dimensional accuracy within millimetres. This greatly reduces the need for post-process machining while still keeping better mechanical properties than traditional casting or forging methods.
Understanding the Fundamentals of DED and Near-Net Shaping
Directed Energy Deposition stands apart from other additive manufacturing techniques due to its unique approach to material addition. Unlike powder bed fusion systems that selectively melt layers of pre-spread powder, DED simultaneously feeds material—either wire or powder—directly into a focused energy source. This energy source, typically a high-powered laser beam ranging from 500 watts to over 12,000 watts, creates a localised melt pool on the substrate surface.
How DED Achieves Dimensional Precision
DED's near-net shaping ability comes from a number of forces that work together. Modern DED machines have systems that constantly check on them and change the amount of energy going in and out in real time, based on changes in the ground temperature and the shape of the melt pool. This adaptive control stops too much material buildup that would need to be removed by machining. When using special wire materials for additive remanufacturing, the system keeps the bead width and height constant, making parts that are usually within ±0.5 mm of their target dimensions. The way heat moves during DED makes conditions that are different from any other manufacturing process. When the high-energy beam hits the substrate, the melt pool can get as hot as 2,000°C or more, based on what is being deposited. Within milliseconds of the beam going forward, the same molten metal starts to cool at speeds that would not be possible in a normal foundry. This quick solidification locks in microstructures with small grains that make the material stronger and less likely to have flaws inside.
The Role of Rapid Solidification in Microstructure Control
Rapid solidification changes the way crystals form in metal that has been deposited in a basic way. In traditional casting, big columnar grains form when the metal cools slowly, which makes it weak in certain directions and opens the door to cracks. Extreme cooling rates in DED, which can reach over 1,000°C per second for thin-walled features, help equiaxed grains form. These regular, randomly arranged crystals spread stress more evenly throughout the part, making it more resistant to fatigue and tougher when hit. At this point, choosing the right wire feedstock is very important. When making special wires for additive remanufacturing, grain refiners like titanium, boron, or zirconium are added, based on the base alloy system. During solidification, these elements work as nucleation sites, which helps a lot of small grains form instead of a few large ones. The result is a deposit that often has better mechanical properties than what the original equipment maker (OEM) specified. Knowing these basics makes it clear why more and more companies in the aerospace, mining, and heavy industry sectors are turning to DED to restore parts. The technology doesn't just fix worn-out parts; it also improves function by making the metal stronger while minimising changes in size.
Specialised Wire Materials for Additive Remanufacturing: Composition and Properties
The effectiveness of any DED operation depends heavily on feedstock quality. Unlike standard welding consumables designed solely for joining two pieces of metal, specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing must perform consistently across hundreds or thousands of deposited layers. These materials undergo precision drawing processes that maintain diameter tolerances within ±0.01mm, ensuring smooth feeding through automated wire delivery systems that can extend several meters from the spool to the deposition head.
Chemical Composition Engineering for Multi-Layer Deposition
In a number of important ways, the chemistry of Specialized wire materials for additive remanufacturing is very different from that of welding wire. The amount of sulphur and phosphorus in premium-grade materials is kept below 0.015%, which is about half of the highest level that is allowed in standard welding wire. Sulphur and phosphorus can cause hot cracks during solidification. The amounts of silicon and manganese are carefully balanced to provide deoxidation without encouraging too much slag formation that could trap inclusions between layers. Stainless steel wire for DED uses, like 316L formulations, usually has molybdenum content in the 2.0–3.0% range to improve corrosion resistance in reconstructed marine parts or chemical processing equipment. As long as the chromium level stays between 16 and 18%, it makes a passive oxide layer that stops chloride attacks. Nickel, which makes up 10–14% of the mixture, stabilises the austenitic structure and makes the material more flexible, so it doesn't break easily when it's hit. Titanium-based wire materials are also very important, especially Ti-6Al-4V alloys that are used a lot to fix up aerospace turbine parts. For additive remanufacturing, these special wire materials need to keep their oxygen content very low—below 0.13%. This is because even a small amount of oxygen picked up during storage or handling weakens their high-temperature strength and wear performance. The aluminium in the mixture makes the solid solution stronger, and the vanadium keeps the beta phase stable. This makes a microstructure that can handle repeated thermal loads.
Mechanical Property Requirements and Testing Protocols
When remanufacturing equipment, manufacturing companies must make sure that the placed material meets or beats the basic performance standards. Tensile strength tests on all-weld metal coupons show whether the wire formulation makes deposits that can handle practical stresses. For hardfacing on mining equipment, the deposited hardness usually needs to be between 58 and 62 HRC to stand up to the rough wear and tear of processing rock and minerals. Frustration resistance is especially important when remanufacturing spinning parts like turbine blades or shafts. The chemistry of the wire has to make deposits that have high endurance limits. This means that the material can withstand an endless number of loading cycles without breaking. Nickel-based superalloy wires like Hastelloy X or Inconel 625 do this through precipitation hardening mechanisms that are active during post-deposition heat treatment. Corrosion resistance testing proves that the wire will work in harsh environments. Specialised wire materials used in additive remanufacturing and intended for marine propulsion systems are tested with salt spray according to ASTM B117 guidelines. These tests usually last more than 1,000 hours without showing any major pitting. Duplex stainless steel wires, which have both ferritic and austenitic phases, are very resistant to chloride stress corrosion cracking and can still be welded through multiple layers. The thermal conductivity of the wire material affects how heat is lost during deposition, which in turn affects the size of the heat-affected zone and the amount of stress that is still present. Copper-nickel alloy wires used in marine applications conduct heat more quickly than stainless steel, so the processing conditions need to be changed to keep the fusion going right. On the other hand, titanium's low thermal conductivity means that heat stays in the melt pool and needs to be carefully controlled so that it doesn't go too deep into the material.
Comparing and Selecting the Best Wire Materials for DED Additive Remanufacturing
The decision between wire and powder feedstock shapes operational efficiency and cost structures in profound ways. Wire-based DED systems achieve material utilisation rates approaching 100%, with virtually no overspray or collection losses. Powder systems, despite their advantages in producing extremely fine features, typically waste 20-50% of material during the spraying process, even with sophisticated powder recovery systems installed.
Wire Versus Powder: A Practical Cost Analysis
When calculating the true cost of remanufacturing a large hydraulic cylinder using DED, wire feedstock presents compelling advantages. A typical repair depositing 5 kilograms of material costs approximately $150-200 using premium stainless steel wire, with negligible waste. The same repair using powder would consume 7-8 kilograms of material due to overspray losses, increasing material costs to $280-350. Over hundreds of repair cycles annually, these savings accumulate substantially. Handling and storage considerations further favour wire materials. Spools of specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing can be stored in standard warehouse conditions without the humidity-controlled environments and vacuum-sealed containers required for metal powders. Titanium and aluminium powders pose fire hazards if improperly stored, requiring explosion-proof facilities and inert gas blanketing systems. Wire eliminates these safety concerns while simplifying inventory management.
Stainless Steel Wire: Versatility and Value
Austenitic stainless steel wires dominate remanufacturing applications due to their broad compatibility with carbon steel, low-alloy steel, and stainless steel substrates. The 308L composition serves as an excellent buffer layer when cladding stainless steel onto carbon steel bases, managing the dilution zone where dissimilar metals mix. Its thermal expansion coefficient lies between carbon steel and higher-chromium stainless grades, minimising stress concentration that could cause delamination during cooling. The 316L wire variant adds molybdenum for enhanced pitting resistance, making it the preferred choice for rebuilding hydraulic components exposed to contaminated fluids or coastal environments. Manufacturing facilities engaged in mining equipment restoration frequently specify 316L wire when remanufacturing hydraulic cylinders that will operate in underground mines where water intrusion and chemical exposure accelerate corrosion. Martensitic stainless steel wires, particularly 420 and 440C grades, provide hardness levels suitable for wear-resistant applications. These specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing can be deposited and subsequently heat-treated to achieve 52-58 HRC hardness, restoring dimensional accuracy on worn crusher components or excavation teeth. The higher carbon content, ranging from 0.15% to over 1.0% depending on grade, enables the formation of hard carbide particles within a tough martensitic matrix.
Titanium Wire: High Performance for Demanding Applications
Aerospace manufacturers rely heavily on titanium wire for turbine component restoration because the material maintains strength at temperatures exceeding 400°C while offering a density roughly 45% lower than steel. The Ti-6Al-4V composition, accounting for more than half of all titanium production, provides an optimal balance of strength, ductility, and corrosion resistance. When deposited through DED, this alloy develops a fine alpha-beta microstructure that can be further refined through post-deposition heat treatment. The procurement cost of titanium wire—typically $45-70 per kilogram for aerospace-grade material—initially appears prohibitive compared to stainless steel at $12-25 per kilogram. However, when remanufacturing a turbine blade worth $15,000-50,000, the material cost becomes a minor fraction of the total component value. The ability to restore these high-value parts to service rather than scrapping them justifies the premium feedstock investment. Titanium's reactivity with atmospheric gases during deposition necessitates specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing with ultra-clean surfaces. Residual drawing lubricants or oxide films cause porosity and hydrogen embrittlement in the deposit. Premium-grade titanium wire undergoes chemical etching or mechanical shaving to remove surface contamination, reducing hydrogen content below 125 ppm to prevent defect formation.
Making Strategic Procurement Decisions
Selecting optimal wire material requires balancing multiple factors beyond simple cost comparison. Material compatibility with the substrate determines whether direct deposition is possible, specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing or if buffer layers are needed. A tool steel component cannot be directly clad with austenitic stainless steel due to excessive dilution and cracking risk. Instead, a nickel-based buffer wire like ERNiCr-3 must be applied first, adding process steps and material costs. Supplier reliability affects production scheduling and quality consistency. Manufacturers conducting high-volume remanufacturing operations need vendors capable of delivering multi-ton wire orders with consistent chemical composition across production lots. Batch-to-batch variation in trace elements can alter deposition characteristics, requiring process parameter adjustments that waste time and test materials. Environmental certifications increasingly influence procurement decisions, particularly for companies serving European and North American markets, where sustainability reporting has become mandatory for large enterprises. Wire manufacturers providing detailed carbon footprint data and using recycled feedstock content help remanufacturers meet their own environmental commitments while maintaining technical performance standards.
Procurement Strategies and Trusted Suppliers of Specialised Wire Materials
Building reliable supply chains for specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing demands rigorous supplier evaluation beyond price comparison. The most cost-effective wire proves expensive if it arrives inconsistently, fails qualification testing, or causes excessive rework due to deposition defects. Manufacturing operations running multi-shift DED systems cannot tolerate feedstock shortages that idle expensive equipment and delay customer deliveries.
Evaluating Supplier Technical Capabilities
Reputable wire manufacturers maintain comprehensive quality documentation, including heat-specific chemical composition reports, mechanical property certifications, and dimensional inspection records. Each spool should include traceable lot numbers linking back to melt certifications from the primary alloy producer. This traceability becomes critical when troubleshooting deposition problems or qualifying materials for aerospace and defence applications subject to strict material pedigree requirements. Supplier technical support capabilities distinguish premium vendors from commodity suppliers. When introducing a new wire composition or troubleshooting porosity issues, access to metallurgists who understand DED-specific challenges proves invaluable. Leading suppliers offer application engineering assistance, helping customers optimise process parameters for their specific equipment and substrate combinations, reducing the trial-and-error period that consumes expensive machine time. ISO 9001 certification represents the baseline quality management standard, but specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing often require additional certifications. AS9100 certification indicates aerospace industry quality compliance, while NADCAP accreditation for welding materials demonstrates the highest level of process control. Suppliers holding these credentials undergo regular third-party audits verifying their ability to consistently produce materials meeting stringent specifications.
Bulk Purchasing and Inventory Management Strategies
Large-scale remanufacturing operations benefit from negotiating annual supply agreements that lock in pricing and guarantee availability. A facility processing 200 hydraulic cylinders monthly might consume 1,200 kilograms of stainless steel wire annually, representing significant purchasing leverage for volume discounts. Annual contracts also stabilise costs against commodity price fluctuations, protecting project profitability when quoting long-term service agreements. Just-in-time delivery arrangements reduce working capital tied up in inventory while ensuring material availability. Rather than stockpiling six months of wire inventory, manufacturers can arrange weekly or biweekly deliveries timed to production schedules. This approach requires suppliers with responsive logistics and multiple stocking locations to prevent disruptions from transportation delays or weather events. Custom wire specifications enable performance optimisation for specific remanufacturing applications. A company specialising in marine propulsion shaft restoration might work with suppliers to develop a proprietary wire chemistry offering superior resistance to cavitation erosion. While custom formulations require larger minimum order quantities—often 500-1,000 kilograms—the performance improvements can differentiate a service provider's offerings in competitive markets.
Logistics and Sustainable Packaging Considerations
Shipping costs and lead times influence total procurement expenses, particularly when sourcing specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing from international suppliers. European wire manufacturers offering premium titanium and nickel alloys typically quote 4-6 week lead times for North American delivery, requiring advanced planning to maintain production continuity. Domestic suppliers may command price premiums but provide faster response to urgent requirements. Sustainable packaging initiatives align with corporate environmental goals while potentially reducing costs. Returnable wire spools eliminate disposal expenses and reduce packaging waste sent to landfills. Some suppliers now offer wire wound on recyclable cardboard cores rather than plastic spools, supporting customers' sustainability reporting obligations without compromising material protection during shipping and storage. The growing emphasis on supply chain transparency extends to raw material sourcing. Customers increasingly request documentation proving that alloy components were not sourced from conflict regions and that mining operations followed responsible environmental practices. Wire suppliers helping these documentation remanufacturers satisfy their own customers' ethical sourcing requirements, particularly when serving aerospace and defence sectors with strict compliance mandates.
Future Trends and Innovations in Wire Materials for Additive Remanufacturing
The evolution of wire materials continues accelerating as additive manufacturing technology advances and industrial sustainability pressures intensify. Research institutions and material suppliers collaborate on developing next-generation alloys specifically engineered for the unique thermal cycles and solidification rates encountered in DED processes. These innovations promise to expand the range of components suitable for remanufacturing while improving deposit quality and reducing processing costs.
Emerging Alloy Systems and Composite Wires
Metal matrix composite wires represent a frontier in remanufacturing technology, embedding ceramic particles within metal matrices to create deposits with extraordinary wear resistance. Tungsten carbide particles dispersed in a nickel-chromium-boron matrix, for example, produce hardness levels exceeding 65 HRC while maintaining sufficient toughness to resist impact in mining equipment applications. These specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing enable restoration of components previously considered beyond economical repair due to extreme wear environments. High-entropy alloys (HEAs), containing five or more principal elements in near-equal proportions, exhibit exceptional strength retention at elevated temperatures and remarkable corrosion resistance. Wire manufacturers have begun producing HEA compositions for DED applications targeting turbine components operating above traditional superalloy temperature limits. While currently expensive due to complex processing requirements, these materials could enable remanufacturing of hot-section components previously requiring complete replacement. Functionally graded materials take advantage of DED's ability to change wire composition mid-process, creating deposits with varying properties through their cross-section. A hydraulic piston rod might be rebuilt using a tough stainless steel core for structural integrity, transitioning to a hard martensitic outer layer for wear resistance. This approach, impossible with conventional welding or thermal spray methods, optimises performance while minimising expensive hardfacing material usage.
Sustainable and Recycled Content Initiatives
Environmental regulations and corporate sustainability, specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing commitments, drive interest in wire materials containing recycled metal content. Several European manufacturers now offer stainless steel wire made with up to 85% post-consumer scrap, maintaining chemical composition and cleanliness standards comparable to virgin material products. The carbon footprint reduction—potentially 50% or more compared to primary metal production—helps remanufacturers demonstrate environmental leadership to environmentally conscious customers. Bio-based drawing lubricants replace petroleum-derived compounds traditionally used during wire manufacturing, reducing volatile organic compound emissions and improving the recyclability of lubricant waste. These plant-oil-based lubricants must be completely removed before DED processing to prevent carbon contamination, but specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing treated with advanced cleaning processes arrive ready for use without additional preparation steps. Closed-loop recycling programs allow remanufacturers to return wire offcuts and test coupons to suppliers for remelting and reprocessing into new wire products. While minimum volume thresholds typically require accumulating several hundred kilograms before economical recycling becomes feasible, large operations can achieve near-zero waste targets while recovering residual value from scrap material.
Industry 4.0 Integration and Smart Manufacturing
Digital traceability systems embedded in wire packaging enable automated inventory management and process documentation. QR codes or RFID tags on wire spools link to cloud-based material certifications, automatically populating production records when operators scan spools before loading them into DED equipment. This integration eliminates manual data entry errors and ensures complete material genealogy documentation required for regulated industries. Predictive analytics algorithms analyse historical deposition data to forecast wire consumption and optimal reorder timing. By monitoring production schedules and historical usage patterns, these systems automatically generate purchase requisitions, preventing stockouts while minimising inventory carrying costs. Advanced implementations even correlate material lot numbers with deposition quality metrics, identifying suppliers and batches that consistently produce superior results. In-process monitoring technologies provide real-time feedback on melt pool characteristics, enabling dynamic adjustment of wire feed rates and energy input. Thermal cameras and spectrometers detect anomalies such as insufficient fusion or excessive dilution, triggering automatic parameter corrections before defects form. These closed-loop control systems, when paired with high-quality specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing, push DED process capabilities toward the consistency levels required for direct production of certified aerospace components, not just remanufacturing applications. Collaborative research initiatives between wire suppliers, equipment manufacturers, and end users accelerate technology development. Industry consortia share non-competitive data on material performance and processing parameters, raising the overall capability baseline while individual organisations maintain competitive advantages through proprietary implementations. This collaborative approach has proven particularly effective in developing standardised material specifications that enable multi-source procurement strategies, reducing supply chain risk.
Conclusion
The synergy between DED technology and specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing delivers transformative capabilities for industrial asset management. By understanding rapid solidification mechanisms and selecting appropriate wire feedstock, manufacturers achieve near-net shaping that minimises post-process machining while enhancing mechanical properties. Strategic procurement from qualified suppliers ensures material consistency that enables reliable, repeatable results across diverse applications from aerospace turbines to mining equipment. As wire material innovation continues through advanced alloys, sustainable formulations, and Industry 4.0 integration, the economic and technical advantages of wire-based DED will strengthen, making remanufacturing increasingly attractive compared to new component manufacturing for high-value industrial assets.
FAQ
1. What differentiates remanufactured wire from standard welding wire?
Remanufacturing wire undergoes more stringent quality control to support multi-layer deposition rather than simple joint formation. The dimensional tolerances are tighter—typically ±0.01mm versus ±0.03mm for welding wire—ensuring consistent feeding through extended automated delivery systems. Chemical purity standards are higher, with sulfur and phosphorus content often reduced by 50% to prevent defect accumulation across hundreds of deposited layers. Surface cleanliness receives particular attention since contaminants that might be tolerable in single-pass welding become problematic when trapped between successive DED layers, potentially causing porosity or delamination.
2. Can specialised wire materials restore components made from different base metals?
Absolutely, though the approach requires careful material selection and often intermediate buffer layers. When rebuilding a carbon steel hydraulic cylinder with stainless steel cladding, a transition wire like 309L bridges the compositional gap between dissimilar base and clad metals. This buffer layer manages the dilution zone where the substrate and deposit mix, preventing brittle intermetallic formation. Similarly, remanufacturing tool steel dies onto mild steel bases demands nickel-based buffer wires that tolerate high dilution while maintaining crack resistance. The specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing used in these applications are specifically formulated to handle thermal expansion mismatches and chemical incompatibilities that would cause conventional welding approaches to fail.
3. How should these materials be stored to maintain quality?
Storage conditions directly impact deposition quality and mechanical properties. Wire spools should be kept in climate-controlled environments, maintaining relative humidity below 60% to prevent moisture absorption, particularly critical for titanium and aluminium alloys prone to hydrogen pickup. Sealed packaging with desiccant packs extends shelf life by preventing surface oxidation that introduces inclusions during melting. Stainless steel wire can typically be stored for 12-18 months under proper conditions, while reactive materials like titanium may require vacuum packaging and refrigerated storage for extended periods. Before use, the wire should be visually inspected for corrosion, mechanical damage, or lubricant residue that could compromise deposition integrity.
4. What causes porosity when using wire materials for remanufacturing?
Porosity stems from multiple sources, often involving surface contamination or improper shielding gas coverage. Drawing lubricants and oxide films on wire surfaces introduce volatile compounds that vaporise in the melt pool, creating gas pockets if unable to escape before solidification. Moisture absorbed from humid storage environments decomposes at high temperatures, releasing hydrogen that forms spherical porosity. Insufficient shielding gas flow allows atmospheric oxygen and nitrogen to contaminate the melt pool, particularly problematic with reactive metals like titanium. Selecting specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing with premium surface finishes—chemically etched or mechanically shaved—minimises contamination sources. Process optimisation, ensuring adequate shielding and proper energy density, allows gases to escape before solidification, producing dense, defect-free deposits.
5. Is wire-based remanufacturing cost-effective compared to powder methods?
Wire-based DED typically offers substantial cost advantages for medium to large component restoration. Material utilisation approaches 100% with wire systems versus 50-80% for powder methods, eliminating waste disposal costs and improving material ROI. Deposition rates with wire systems often reach 2-5 kilograms per hour, multiple times faster than powder systems, achieving 0.1-0.5 kg/hr for comparable components. This productivity difference translates directly to reduced machine time per part, lowering overhead allocation and increasing throughput. While powder systems excel at producing extremely fine features below 1mm width, most industrial remanufacturing involves features measured in centimetres, where the wire's speed advantage dominates. The total cost calculation must include equipment investment—wire-fed systems generally costing 30-50% less than powder-bed alternatives—making wire the economically rational choice for remanufacturing operations focused on large industrial components rather than intricate prototypes.
Partner with RIIR: Your Specialised Wire Materials for Additive Remanufacturing Supplier
RIIR, the innovation platform of TyonTech, delivers comprehensive DED remanufacturing solutions backed by advanced wire material expertise and proven industrial success. Our Xi'an Intelligent Remanufacturing Research Institute operates state-of-the-art laser additive workstations with up to 12,000 watts of power, paired with specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing that we've optimised through thousands of successful component restorations. Whether you're remanufacturing mining equipment hydraulic cylinders, aerospace turbine components, or marine propulsion systems, our technical team provides complete support, specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing from failure analysis through final testing. We maintain relationships with certified wire materials suppliers globally, ensuring you receive the optimal feedstock for your specific applications at competitive pricing. RIIR's commitment extends beyond equipment and materials—we offer comprehensive training, process development, and ongoing technical consultation to maximise your remanufacturing operation's efficiency and quality. Contact our team at tyontech@xariir.cn to discuss your component restoration requirements and discover how our specialised wire materials for additive remanufacturing manufacturer partnerships can reduce your costs while improving part performance. Let us help you transform equipment lifecycle management through intelligent remanufacturing solutions that deliver measurable ROI.
References
1. DebRoy, T., Wei, H.L., Zuback, J.S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J.W., Milewski, J.O., Beese, A.M., Wilson-Heid, A., De, A. and Zhang, W. (2018). "Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Components – Process, Structure and Properties," Progress in Materials Science, Volume 92, pp. 112-224.
2. Frazier, W.E. (2014). "Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review," Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp. 1917-1928.
3. Keicher, D.M. and Miller, W.D. (1998). "LENS Moves Beyond RP to Direct Fabrication," Metal Powder Report, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp. 26-28.
4. Thompson, S.M., Bian, L., Shamsaei, N. and Yadollahi, A. (2015). "An Overview of Direct Laser Deposition for Additive Manufacturing; Part I: Transport Phenomena, Modelling and Diagnostics," Additive Manufacturing, Volume 8, pp. 36-62.
5. Wilson, J.M., Piya, C., Shin, Y.C., Zhao, F. and Ramani, K. (2014). "Remanufacturing of Turbine Blades by Laser Direct Deposition with Its Energy and Environmental Impact Analysis," Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 80, pp. 170-178.
6. Zheng, B., Zhou, Y., Smugeresky, J.E., Schoenung, J.M. and Lavernia, E.J. (2008). "Thermal Behaviour and Microstructure Evolution during Laser Deposition with Laser-Engineered Net Shaping: Part II. Experimental Investigation and Discussion," Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Volume 39, Issue 9, pp. 2237-2245.



